Re: Performance of archive logging in a PITR restore

From: Joshua D. Drake
Subject: Re: Performance of archive logging in a PITR restore
Date: ,
Msg-id: 1237220490.29552.1.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
(view: Whole thread, Raw)
In response to: Performance of archive logging in a PITR restore  ("Mark Steben")
Responses: Re: Performance of archive logging in a PITR restore  (Heikki Linnakangas)
List: pgsql-performance

On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 12:11 -0400, Mark Steben wrote:
> First of all, I did pose this question first on the pgsql – admin
> mailing list.


> The issue is that during a restore on a remote site, (Postgres 8.2.5)
>
> archived logs are taking an average of 35 – 40 seconds apiece to
> restore.

Archive logs are restored in a serialized manner so they will be slower
to restore in general.

Joshua D. Drake



--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: 
   Consulting, Development, Support, Training
   503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
   The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997



pgsql-performance by date:

From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: High CPU Utilization
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres benchmarking with pgbench