On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 14:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 14:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> You're just putting the hard decision onto packagers, who have no more
> >> knowledge than you do about what their users want, and (probably)
> >> considerably less understanding of the benefits/risks of some new
> >> configure option they happen to notice.
At this point I don't know that any of this is going anywhere. I have
presented what I think is a reasonable compromise to accept the feature.
A compile-time option which was as designed all along with a flag called
experimental. Which will be vastly easier to get people to test over
time versus having to run a fork.
I am for including this patch. I believe it is worth the risk.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 -
http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
