Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches
Date
Msg-id 1235516325.16176.257.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 16:52 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:

> I didn't think I had proposed any such thing, although maybe I'm just
> not remembering.  I'm pretty confused as to what the current thread is
> all about.

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-01/msg00978.php

I don't think anyone who argued in favour of removal of existing system
was aware that we'd lose anything as a result. I think everybody
supports the easier-if-possible sentiment that Heikki was expressing; I
just don't want to let that be seen as agreement to remove, by default,
at a later time.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Hot standby, recovery procs