Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements
Date
Msg-id 1233772747.3805.2.camel@dell.linuxdev.us.dell.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 20:38 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Also, I really think it's a pretty bad idea to make index cost
> estimation depend on the current state of the index's pending list
> --- that state seems far too transient to base plan choices on.

I'm confused by this. Don't we want to base the plan choice on the most
current data, even if it is transient?

Regards,Jeff Davis

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: add_path optimization
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: LIMIT NULL