Re: Hot Standby (v9d) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Hot Standby (v9d)
Date
Msg-id 1233672026.4500.160.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hot Standby (v9d)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Hot Standby (v9d)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 09:14 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:

> I think _the_ solution is to notice when you're about to vacuum a page
> that is still visible to a running backend on the standby, and save
> that page off to a separate cache of old page versions (perhaps using
> the relation fork mechanism).

I'll let you write that, for the next release...

The problem with all of this is we've been talking about it for 8 months
now and various opinions are held by people. What is being presented is
a broad set of options (summarised from Wiki)

1. Wait then cancel
a) always for databases, tablespaces and locks
b) deferred cancelation for buffer changes

2. We connect to Primary server from Standby server and keep a
transaction open using contrib/dblink functions, then commit as soon as
we are done.

3. We pause recovery by issuing a pg_recovery_pause() function, or start
server in pause mode using recovery_started_paused = on.

Yes, it's a critical area to the success of the feature. But this is
enough for first release and for us to get user feedback.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Hot Standby (v9d)
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Hot Standby (v9d)