On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 20:11 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 17:50 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >
> >> Hmm, I think we have small issue if the last WAL segment restored from
> >> the archive is an incomplete one:
> >
> > All normal archive recoveries have "complete" WAL files, since an xlog
> > switch record jumps past missing entries at the end of the file. So I
> > was just about to say "how can it be an incomplete one?", to which the
> > answer is file damage of some kind causing a failed CRC check.
> >
> > So yes, it is possible and no, the patch doesn't work that way yet.
>
> Actually, the code already deals with that possibility. That's the
> motivation for the timelines: the new WAL record will be generated with
> a new timelineid. We never append to an existing WAL file after archive
> recovery.
Now I'm confused. You're disagreeing with what you just said?
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
