On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 12:40 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> >>> Again, "\dfS" would be a bit useless, unless we say that the implicit
> >>> U modifier for no pattern doesn't override an explicit S modifier.
> >>>
> >>> Comments? Does this cover all the cases?
> >>
> >> So would "\df" then be equivalent to "\dU"? Or am I misunderstanding
> >> something?
>
> > \df would act as it does now. Showing you *everything*.
>
> Which part of the quoted paragraph didn't you read?
Apparently at least part. Sorry for the noise.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 -
http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
