Re: pg_dump versus views and opclasses - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_dump versus views and opclasses
Date
Msg-id 12321.1232207569@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump versus views and opclasses  ("Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_dump versus views and opclasses  ("Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com> writes:
> Update.  Turns out that 8.4 DOES know how to execute the view.  If you
> try to group on a user-defined composite type, 8.4 just goes ahead and
> groups it, rather than giving the old "could not identify an ordering
> operator" error.

Is there a hash opclass for the type?  8.4 can group types that have
hash but not btree opclasses, but prior versions insisted on btree.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Brendan Jurd"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump versus views and opclasses
Next
From: "Brendan Jurd"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump versus views and opclasses