Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> 2014-04-14 14:57 GMT+02:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:
>> I agree. I don't think the idea of pushing this into the
>> log_line_prefix stuff as a one-off is a very good one. Sure, we could
>> wedge it in there, but we've got an existing precedent that everything
>> that you can get with log_line_prefix also shows up in the CSV output
>> file. And it's easy to imagine LOTS more counters that somebody might
>> want to have.
I think this argument is sufficient to kill this line of proposal
entirely.
regards, tom lane
