Re: benchmarking the query planner - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: benchmarking the query planner
Date
Msg-id 1229111056.8673.100.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: benchmarking the query planner  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: benchmarking the query planner  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 13:20 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> > Solutions can also include
> > * manual mechanism for setting ndistinct that doesn't keep getting
> > overwritten by subsequent ANALYZEs
> 
> Hmm, that might actually be the most practical answer for large,
> reasonably-static tables.  Especially if we expose the "negative
> stadistinct" feature to let people specify it as a fraction of table
> size.

Works for me. Especially if you want to think more about ANALYZE before
changing that.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ron Mayer
Date:
Subject: Re: benchmarking the query planner
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code