On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 19:33 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 11:29 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > > As I said before, if you think something is missing, submit a software
> > > or a doc patch and submit it to peer review. Until then, I think its
> > > misleading to claim that only your magic spice makes replication work
> > > correctly and to make out everybody else had to go through huge pains to
> > > get it to work. Cos I get emails all the time saying how easy it was to
> > > configure and easy to administrate.
> >
> > I didn't say only my magic does that. What I said was purely factual.
> > That PostgreSQL by itself doesn't provide everything you need to get log
> > shipping working and my *ONLY* point was that we should be clear when
> > people ask, that they will have to roll their own to a degree.
>
> Software or doc patch, please, if you want them to be really clear.
We can't back patch features and like I said previously, 8.4 doesn't
really suffer from this assuming you get your patch committed.
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
