Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code
Date
Msg-id 1228391866.20796.541.camel@hp_dx2400_1
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 12:41 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:

> > Understood. Is the periodic renegotiation of keys something that would
> > interfere with the performance or robustness of replication? Is the
> > delay likely to effect sync rep? I'm just checking we've thought about
> > it.
> 
> It will certainly add an extra piece of delay. But if you are worried
> about performance for it, you are likely not running SSL. Plus, if you
> don't renegotiate the key, you gamble with security.
> 
> If it does have a negative effect on the robustness of the replication,
> we should just recommend against using it - or refuse to use - not
> disable renegotiation.

I didn't mean to imply renegotiation might optional. I just wanted to
check whether there is anything to worry about as a result of it, there
may not be. *If* it took a long time, I would not want sync commits to
wait for it.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code
Next
From: Zdenek Kotala
Date:
Subject: Re: In-place upgrade: catalog side