Re: What's going on with pgfoundry? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?
Date
Msg-id 1227737562.9359.230.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
Responses Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?
Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 18:06 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> > Since were chatting :P. My vote would be to move everything back to port
> > 22 and force key based auth only.
> 
> How does that work?  Does that kill the script kiddies in their tracks?  I'm 
> guessing so, but had never thought to try it ...
> 

Well they can still talk to the port of course but its irrelevant
because unless they have an ssh key, they aren't getting in. Period.


> How would someone upload their key if they don't have access?  Some sort of web 
> interface?  One wouldn't want to throw extra admin overhead if it can be 
> avoided ...
> 

See other comment on this.

Joshua D. Drake


-- 
PostgreSQL  Consulting, Development, Support, Training  503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/  The PostgreSQL
Company,serving since 1997
 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?
Next
From: "Pavel Stehule"
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: default values for function parameters