Re: What's going on with pgfoundry? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?
Date
Msg-id 1227736859.9359.201.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?  (Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 13:57 -0800, Steve Crawford wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
> >
> >
> > We should move to a port-knocking
> > <http://dotancohen.com/howto/portknocking.html> or other modern
> > strategy if we're going to move at all.
> >
> >   
> Yeah, but telling my firewall to move port 22 inside to port xxxx 
> outside took less time than writing this email. Inside the firewall 
> plain old ssh continues to work fine and I don't have to deal with 
> issues of forwarding additional ports through the firewall, mucking with 
> iptables rules, etc.
> 
> For my servers, moving outside access to a non-standard port has proven 
> 100% effective for over a year so additional complexity hasn't been 
> warranted.

Since were chatting :P. My vote would be to move everything back to port
22 and force key based auth only.

Joshua D. Drake


> 
> Cheers,
> Steve
> 
> 
-- 
PostgreSQL  Consulting, Development, Support, Training  503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/  The PostgreSQL
Company,serving since 1997
 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Steve Crawford
Date:
Subject: Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?