Re: Bad performance on simple query - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Dimi Paun
Subject Re: Bad performance on simple query
Date
Msg-id 1226943062.5760.103.camel@dimi.lattica.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bad performance on simple query  ("Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Bad performance on simple query  ("Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 10:16 -0700, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> Ahhh.  Keep in mind that if you just run the query, pgadminIII will
> tell you how long it took to run AND return all the data across the
> network, so it will definitely take longer then.  But most of that's
> network io wait so it's not a real issue unless you're saturating your
> network.

But that is brutal -- there's no way it can take 20ms for a request
across an unloaded network.

Moreover, I got something like this:

            pgadminIII | pgsql
w/o index:     45ms      0.620ms
w/ index       20ms      0.091ms

How now I try to replicate, and I get 45ms in both cases. This is
very misleading...

--
Dimi Paun <dimi@lattica.com>
Lattica, Inc.


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Scott Marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Bad performance on simple query
Next
From: "Scott Marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Bad performance on simple query