Re: Reducing some DDL Locks to ShareLock - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Reducing some DDL Locks to ShareLock
Date
Msg-id 1226448439.27904.320.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Reducing some DDL Locks to ShareLock  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Reducing some DDL Locks to ShareLock  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 19:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

> The reason I was thinking about heap_lock_tuple is that it might provide
> a suitable defense against that case.

OK. Lock tuple works OK, but its the unlock that I'm worried about. How
would non-transactional un-lock tuple work?

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jaime Casanova"
Date:
Subject: Re: failed test float8 on mingw
Next
From: Chuck McDevitt
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimizing COPY