Re: Block-level CRC checks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Csaba Nagy
Subject Re: Block-level CRC checks
Date
Msg-id 1222877225.13669.39.camel@PCD12478
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Block-level CRC checks  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 16:57 +0100, Gregory Stark wrote:
> I wonder if we could do something clever here though. Only one process
> is busy
> calculating the checksum -- it just has to know if anyone fiddles the hint
> bits while it's busy.

What if the hint bits are added at the very end to the checksum, with an
exclusive lock to them ? Then the exclusive lock should be short
enough... only it might be deadlock-prone as any lock upgrade...

Cheers,
Csaba.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hitoshi Harada"
Date:
Subject: Re: Common Table Expressions (WITH RECURSIVE) patch
Next
From: Florian Weimer
Date:
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks