Re: Block-level CRC checks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hannu Krosing
Subject Re: Block-level CRC checks
Date
Msg-id 1222865973.19171.3.camel@huvostro
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Block-level CRC checks  (pgsql@mohawksoft.com)
Responses Re: Block-level CRC checks
Re: Block-level CRC checks
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 17:13 -0400, pgsql@mohawksoft.com wrote:
> >
> > I believe the idea was to make this as non-invasive as possible. And
> > it would be really nice if this could be enabled without a dump/
> > reload (maybe the upgrade stuff would make this possible?)
> > --
> 
> It's all about the probability of a duplicate check being generated. If
> you use a 32 bit checksum, then you have a theoretical probability of 1 in
> 4 billion that a corrupt block will be missed (probably much lower
> depending on your algorithm). If you use a short, then a 1 in 65 thousand
> probability. If you use an 8 bit number, then 1 in 256.
> 
> Why am I going on? Well, if there are any spare bits in a block header,
> they could be used for the check value.

Even and 64-bit integer is just 0.1% of 8k page size, and it is even
less than 0.1% likely that page will be 100% full and thus that 64bits
wastes any real space at all.

So I don't think that this is a space issue.

---------------
Hannu




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial prefetch performance testing
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks