Re: parallel pg_restore - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: parallel pg_restore
Date
Msg-id 1222077849.4445.150.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: parallel pg_restore  (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>)
Responses Re: parallel pg_restore  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 09:53 +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:

> > My intention is to have single-thread restore remain the default, at
> > least for this go round, and have the user be able to choose
> > --multi-thread=nn to specify the number of concurrent connections to use.
> 
> What about the make famous -j option?
> 
>        -j [jobs], --jobs[=jobs]
>             Specifies the number of jobs (commands) to run simultaneously.  If
>             there  is  more than one -j option, the last one is effective.  If
>             the -j option is given without an argument, make  will  not  limit
>             the number of jobs that can run simultaneously.

+1

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial prefetch performance testing
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: parallel pg_restore