Re: idle connection timeout ... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: idle connection timeout ...
Date
Msg-id 12220.1035578621@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: idle connection timeout ...  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Responses Re: idle connection timeout ...  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 16:17, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I prefer GUC variables to table entries for setting stuff like recursion
>> limits; they're much lighter-weight to create and access, and you don't
>> need an initdb to add or remove a parameter.

> I don't see an adequate way to store the individual settings as GUC
> variables per user...

Have you looked at the per-database and per-user GUC facilities in 7.3?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: idle connection timeout ...
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Time for RC1 soon?