Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6
Date
Msg-id 12189.1556575627@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since9.6
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
>> Taking this as a WIP, what do you think?

> Seems generally about right.

Andres, are you pushing this forward?  Next week's minor releases
are coming up fast, and we're going to need to adapt the HEAD patch
significantly for the back branches AFAICS.  So there's little time
to spare.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: "long" type is not appropriate for counting tuples
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since9.6