Re: Fix pgstatindex using for large indexes - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Fix pgstatindex using for large indexes
Date
Msg-id 12185.1206069099@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fix pgstatindex using for large indexes  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-patches
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Hmm, this followup patch is wrong though -- the SQL definition is still
> using BIGINT where it should be using double.  And the other changes to
> use BIGINT where the original values were int4 seem unnecessary.

I'm on this one now ...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Brendan Jurd"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Empty arrays with ARRAY[]
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix pgstatindex using for large indexes