Re: building pdfs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: building pdfs
Date
Msg-id 1216.1406558890@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: building pdfs  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 07/27/2014 11:28 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Personally I find the PDF docs to be an anachronism: surely nobody
>> is printing them on dead trees any more, and for on-computer usage,
>> what do they offer that the HTML format doesn't?  So I'm unexcited
>> about making them slightly prettier.

> If they are then maybe there's no point in trying to build them in the 
> buildfarm constantly.

> One advantage that they have over the HTML docs is that they encapsulate 
> the docs in a single file. But then, so does the epub format, which, 
> unlike PDFs, can adapt to display dimensions.

Hm.  I recall Peter was experimenting with building epub format.  Maybe we
could start moving over to that, if there's a mature toolchain.  I keep
fearing we are going to run up against document-size limits in the
jadetex toolchain (and unlike the last time, it may not be so easy to
modify the limits --- there are hard-wired limits inside TeX).
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Marti Raudsepp
Date:
Subject: Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] pg_dump behaves differently for different archive formats