Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?
Date
Msg-id 1214845.1605816848@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> On 11/19/20 12:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Here's a proposed patch for that.  I was amused to discover that we have
>> a couple of regression test cases making use of IS OF.

> I didn't check but those might be my fault ;-)

I suspect at least one of them is mine ;-).  But I didn't check.

> Looks good to me.

Thanks for looking!

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Issue with server side statement-level rollback