On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 11:30 -0400, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> wrote:
> > SMART doesn't detect 100% of drive failures in advance, but you'd be silly
> > to setup a database system where you don't get to take advantage of the
> > ~50% it does catch before you lose any data.
>
> Can't argue with that one.
SMART has certainly saved our butts more than once.
Joshua D. Drake
