Re: [HACKERS] Bug with pg_basebackup and 'shared' tablespace - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pierre Ducroquet
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Bug with pg_basebackup and 'shared' tablespace
Date
Msg-id 12141468.I2p1QpBrrR@peanuts2
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Bug with pg_basebackup and 'shared' tablespace  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Bug with pg_basebackup and 'shared' tablespace
Re: [HACKERS] Bug with pg_basebackup and 'shared' tablespace
List pgsql-hackers
On Wednesday, September 13, 2017 6:01:43 PM CEST you wrote:
> > On 15 May 2017, at 07:26, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
> > wrote:> 
> > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 2:28 AM, Pierre Ducroquet <p.psql@pinaraf.info> 
wrote:
> >> I will submit this patch in the current commit fest.
> > 
> > I have not spotted any flaws in the refactored logic.
> 
> This patch no longer applies, could you take a look at it and submit a new
> version rebased on top of HEAD?
> 
> cheers ./daniel

Hi

All my apologies for the schockingly long time with no answer on this topic.
Attached to this email is the new version of the patch, checked against HEAD 
and REL_10_STABLE, with the small change required by Michael (affect true/
false to the boolean instead of 1/0) applied.
I will do my best to help review some patches in the current CF.

 Pierre
-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables
Next
From: Michael Banck
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Clarification in pg10's pgupgrade.html step 10(upgrading standby servers)