On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 11:31 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Ah, yes, this is certainly something we always want to avoid ---
> having
> one company be so closely associated with Postgres that people think
> the
> company owns it and therefore controls it.
>
> Is that a problem now? What things can the community or companies do
> to avoid that?
I think you, as a Core member, should answer that question, not me.
> We could scale back contributions, but I am afraid that will hurt more
> than help.
I notice you said "we" when you meant "EnterpriseDB". This list is about
PostgreSQL advocacy, not the companies we belong to...
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support