On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 11:31 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> Ah, yes, this is certainly something we always want to avoid --- having
> one company be so closely associated with Postgres that people think the
> company owns it and therefore controls it.
>
> Is that a problem now? What things can the community or companies do to
> avoid that? We could scale back contributions, but I am afraid that
> will hurt more than help.
I don't see it as a problem in any way at this point, it used to be... 7
years ago. Now there are just too many companies and contributors
involved.
Joshua D. Drake
