Re: PostgreSQL derivatives - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy
From | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Subject | Re: PostgreSQL derivatives |
Date | |
Msg-id | 1213285451.11470.33.camel@jd-laptop Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: PostgreSQL derivatives (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Responses |
Re: PostgreSQL derivatives
Re: PostgreSQL derivatives |
List | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 06:37 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 00:05 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Simon Riggs wrote: > > The bottom line is that Greenplum is fading farther and farther from > > Postgres community involvement, as far as I can tell. :-( > > I agree with that assessment. I don't think it's a desirable or > unchangeable outcome, which is why I initially refused to attend the > recent EnterpriseDB-sponsored developer meeting unless Greenplum people > were also invited. I would like to see people encourage their > participation. When the project allowed one company to sponsor the > meeting it made a huge error, especially when the project had no need > for the funding. I find this line of thought bogosity and I thank EDB for sponsoring lunch for the event. I am also pretty sure knowing Dave, Denis and Andy that if I had said, "I would like to sponsor part of the meeting" they would have let CMD do so. As much as I like to carouse about EDB the fact is they are a fair community player and they try very hard to make sure they don't step on toes. > It sent the wrong message and I noted that Truviso were > not represented either, on the day. I am worried about contribution I guarantee you they could have been, should they wanted to be. Considering that GreenPlum and Truviso are not EDB competitors, CMD is. CMD was well represented. > levels from all companies and also note that EnterpriseDB's real > contributions to the community of late are not significantly larger than > 2ndQuadrant's, now you've spurred me to think about the topic. I find when one feels the need to quantify the amount of contributions they are making against another, they are feeling somewhat inadequate about their own participation. Which is one of the reasons I think you don't see EDB and CMD comparing themselves at all. Since you brought it up, although your participation is greatly appreciated and is significant you are not 5 people and last I checked EDB was sponsoring 5 people to contribute to this community and they are doing so. Including: Pavel Dave Bruce Heikki Greg Stark So I would consider your point pretty much moot, unless of course your only argument is lines of code. > What can > we do to actively encourage participation from all companies? > I know that JoshB and I are constantly speaking with companies to get them to contribute (code and otherwise). Joshua D. Drake
pgsql-advocacy by date: