Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 1212098076.27385.73.camel@jd-laptop
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Responses Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 17:42 -0400, Robert Treat wrote:

> 
> I would have thought the read only piece would have been more important than 
> the synchronous piece. In my experience readable slaves is the big selling 
> point in both Oracle and MySQL's implementations, and people are not nearly 
> as concerned if there is a small asynchronous window.  

The read only piece is the more important piece from a market
perspective. 

Joshua D. Drake




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL