On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 17:20 +0200, Bernd Helmle wrote:
> --On Donnerstag, Mai 08, 2008 14:42:50 +0100 Simon Riggs
> <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> > That makes sense. I can't see how we would make LOCAL CHECK CONSTRAINTs
> > work with rules anyhow.
>
> One of the idea's that came up through the discussion was to make the
> rewriter responsible for collecting check constraints such as the local
> check condition. They would be pushed down to the executor then where the
> correct constraints would be applied. However, i'm currently not in the
> position to say if this is doable right now.
That's what I was thinking too.
> The original updatable views patch tracked the state of required and
> applied rule conditions during rewrite. This way it applied only the rule
> conditions of the specified view in cascading updates.
Yes, seems like the only way we'll get LOCAL CHECK CONSTRAINTS to work.
Are you planning to work on this?
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
