Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
> There's no reason to create user defined collations with collencoding=-
> 1. As far as I can tell, collencoding is only there to hide built-in
> collations (inherited from template0) that aren't compatible with the
> current database encoding. So we can just always create user-defined
> collations with collencoding=GetDatabaseEncoding().
What happens if somebody makes a user-defined collation in template0
and then clones that into a different encoding? I guess the user-defined
collation would then be hidden/inaccessible in the clone DB, so maybe it's
fine.
regards, tom lane
