Re: Socket communication for contrib - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Socket communication for contrib
Date
Msg-id 12073.1081180256@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Socket communication for contrib  (Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: Socket communication for contrib  (Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres@cybertec.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres@cybertec.at> writes:
> Nested transactions: I don't think nested transactions will really help 
> to resolve the core problem. Committing a subtransaction will most 
> likely not imply that a parent transaction can be committed as well.

Agreed.

> As I said: Some people MIGHT find it useful in some special cases.
> If the community decides that it does not enough sense to integrate it 
> into contrib I can live with that.

I won't take a position on whether it's useful enough to put in contrib,
but if people want it there, I'd just ask that the README be extended to
point out the transactional risks.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig
Date:
Subject: Re: Socket communication for contrib
Next
From: Bob.Henkel@hartfordlife.com
Date:
Subject: Re: Socket communication for contrib