Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Temp tables are the wrong way to think about it. *Any* invalidation
>> of schema data referred to in a query plan should cause replanning.
>> We have a TODO item covering this already, don't we?
> If we do, I don't see it. Care to give me one?
Hmm, I don't see one either. Odd, we've sure discussed it often enough.
How about
* Flush cached query plans when their underlying catalog data changes
Probably belongs under "DEPENDENCY CHECKING".
BTW, I was slightly startled to read this under URGENT:
* Allow row re-use without vacuum (Tom)
I don't consider this urgent or even likely ever to happen, and
I certainly have not taken responsibility to do it.
regards, tom lane
