Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve postmaster's logging of listen socket creation. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve postmaster's logging of listen socket creation.
Date
Msg-id 1206.1489462993@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve postmaster's logging oflisten socket creation.  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve postmaster's logging oflisten socket creation.  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> I don't mind the new output, but I kinda wonder whether it's a good idea
> to include the '.s.PGSQL.5432' bit in the host and/or whether we
> shouldn't include the port in the TCP cases as well

Yeah, I've been thinking that maybe it should look like

2017-03-13 10:08:49.399 EDT [90059] LOG:  listening on IPv6 address "::1", port 5432
2017-03-13 10:08:49.399 EDT [90059] LOG:  listening on IPv4 address "127.0.0.1", port 5432
2017-03-13 10:08:49.400 EDT [90059] LOG:  listening on Unix address "/tmp/.s.PGSQL.5432"

It would take a couple more lines of code to make that happen, but
it would future-proof the messages against the day we decide to
allow one server to respond to more than one port number ...
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve postmaster's logging oflisten socket creation.
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes