02.03.2026 22:09, Sami Imseih пишет:
>>> It says “Each is indexed by ProcNumber”, but it’s no longer accurate for OldestMemberMXactId prepared-xact entries,
whichnow use index (procno - FIRST_PREPARED_XACT_PROC_NUMBER).
>>
>> Fixed those and some other comment work, and pushed. Thanks!
>>
>
> Thanks! what are your thoughts about adding a test like the one
> here [1] ? This allows us to test correct handling of prepared
> transaction dummy procs. The asserts added will not cover
> this case.
>
> What do you think?
>
> [1] [https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA5RZ0twq5bNMq0r0QNoopQnAEv%2BJ3qJNCrLs7HVqTEntBhJ%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com]
I support: test for bug fixed is a good thing.
--
regards
Yura Sokolov aka funny-falcon
