On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 08:24 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > As Greg mentions on another thread, not all patches are *intended* to be
> > production quality by their authors. Many patches are shared for the
> > purpose of eliciting general feedback. You yourself encourage a group
> > development approach and specifically punish those people dropping
> > completely "finished" code into the queue and expecting it to be
> > committed as-is.
> If you post a patch that is not intended to be of production quality, it
> is best to mark it so explicitly. Then nobody can point fingers at you.
> Also, Bruce would then know not to put it in the queue of patches
> waiting for application.
So it can be forgotten about entirely? Hmmmm.
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk
