On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 10:29 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > --multidump-prefix=foobar
> > and it creates foobar.1.predata, foobar.2.data, foobar.3.postdata
> >
> > or something like that? The number would help to sort them
> > appropriately, and the string would ensure that you know what each file
> > is ... perhaps we could have %-escapes in the name to expand to both of
> > these? Perhaps we could have other %-escapes for things like database
> > name --- so you could say --multidump-filename=%d.%n.%t.dump ... but
> > then it would be nice to have strftime escapes too.
> >
> > Or is this too complex?
> >
>
> Yes, I think it is. We do not have to be infinitely flexible. KISS seems
> apposite.
What syntax do you suggest?
How about we use the --file as the prefix?
and just use a postfix of .1 and .2 and .3
-- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
