Re: trying to connect to pg from within a local network - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

If the server is running on Windows, all recent versions of Windows run
a built-in firewall by default that will block remote access to the PG
port.  Have you confirmed that the firewall is either not running, or
has an exception for the PG port?

-- Mark Lewis

On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 16:46 +0100, Albe Laurenz wrote:
> Albretch Mueller wrote:
>
> > Now, I am also getting "connection refused" messages even though I do
> > know  tc is running since I can check it with pdAdmin3
> >
> > org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: Connection refused. Check that the
> > hostname and port are correct and that the postmaster is accepting
> > TCP/IP connections.
>
> Bad. pgAdmin3 runs on the server, right?
> So local connections are possible. Good to know.
>
> >> You should have the following in postgresql.conf:
> >> listen_addresses = '127.0.0.1,10.0.31.5'
> >
> >  I did change it
>
> Good.
>
> >> Allowing certain client IP addresses is done in pg_hba.conf.
> >
> >  OK, I did too, this is how my /data/pg_hba.conf looks like:
> >
> > # TYPE  DATABASE    USER        CIDR-ADDRESS          METHOD
> >
> > # IPv4 local connections:
> > host     all     all     127.0.0.1/32,10.0.31.62     md5
> > # IPv6 local connections:
> > #host    all         all         ::1/128               md5
>
> That is not correct, you should have entries like this:
>
> host    all    all    127.0.0.1/32    md5
> host    all    all    10.0.31.62/32    md5
> host    all    all    0.0.0.0/0        reject
>
> But that should not lead to a "connection refused" message like you
> encounter, but to a "there is no pg_hba.conf entry" message.
>
> So that is not the immediate problem, though it will become later on.
>
> >> Try the following on the client: telnet 10.0.31.5 5432
> >
> > C:\>telnet 10.0.31.5 5432
> > Connecting To 10.0.31.5...Could not open connection to the host, on
> > port 5432: Connect failed
>
> That means that either
> a) the PostgreSQL server is not listening on this port
> or
> b) a firewall blocks you.
>
> >> Try the following on the server: netstat -a
> >
> >  on the server:
> >
> > C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>netstat -a
> >
> > Active Connections
> >
> >   Proto  Local Address          Foreign Address        State
> [...]
> >   TCP    BNG-04:5432        BNG-04.exchange.goodwillny.org:0  LISTENING
> [...]
>
> OK, that's your PostgreSQL server listening.
>
> > > Is there a firewall involved?
> >
> >  Not from my box, which is a client to pg
>
> The firewall could also be somewhere between your client and the server.
>
> > //__ "netstat -a" on my client box
> > C:\>netstat -a
> >
> > Active Connections
> >
> >   Proto  Local Address          Foreign Address        State
> [...]
> >   TCP    BNG-2008:1152      10.0.31.5:netbios-ssn  ESTABLISHED
> [...]
>
> That at least shows that it is possible to get TCP connections from
> your client to the server. At least on port 139.
> Could still be that a firewall blocks other ports.
>
>
> Ok, let's sum up:
>
> - Your server is up and running (you can connect locally).
> - Your server is listening on port 5432.
> - You cannot open a TCP connection from client to server on port 5432
>   (but on port 139 you can).
>
> That looks too me like a network/firewall problem.
> I know too little about networks, particularly on Windows, to tell you
> how to proceed.
>
> But to confirm my suspicion, there's a few things you can try:
>
> - From the client, try "telnet 10.0.31.5 139".
>   That should not give you an error message.
>
> - From the server, try "telnet 10.0.31.5 5432".
>   That should also not give you an error message.
>
> If these two work, but "telnet 10.0.31.5 5432" from the client
> gives you a "connection refused", I don't know whom to blame but
> the network configuration.
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
>                http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq