Re: BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements
Date
Msg-id 1200427883.4266.1777.camel@ebony.site
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements
List pgsql-bugs
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 14:50 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Kevin Hunt" <kevin@centropy.com> writes:
> > The description of %p is misleading since it is replaced with not just the
> > path, but also filename.
>
> Hm?  "Path name" includes the file name in all usages I know about.

Agreed.

> > An example showing how the sample commands would be expanded would also
> > help:
>
> That sounds reasonable.

Yep, I'll scan the docs and submit a patch, unless Tom has already.

--
  Simon Riggs
  2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements