Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?
Date
Msg-id 120.1006640540@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> OK, but when we recommend, we had better tell them to start using GUC
> and not long command-line options _unless_ long options are supported on
> their platform.  Without that, there will be confusion.

This is entirely irrelevant, because the postmaster and backend don't
have any long options (except GUC variables which work anyway).
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?