On 02/12/16 02:55, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On 11/30/16 8:06 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>> On 30/11/16 22:37, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>> I have taken the libpqwalreceiver refactoring patch and split it into
>>>> two: one for the latch change, one for the API change. I have done some
>>>> mild editing.
>>>>
>>>> These two patches are now ready to commit in my mind.
>>
>>> Hi, looks good to me, do you plan to commit this soon or would you
>>> rather me to resubmit the patches rebased on top of this (and including
>>> this) first?
>>
>> committed those two
>
> Commit 597a87ccc9a6fa8af7f3cf280b1e24e41807d555 left some comments
> behind that referred to the select() that it removed. Maybe rewrite
> like in the attached?
Agreed.
>
> I wonder if it would be worth creating and reusing a WaitEventSet here.
>
I don't think it's worth the extra code given that this is rarely called
interface.
-- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
