Re: [HACKERS] check with serial - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] check with serial
Date
Msg-id 11ae99b5-63e8-9c77-cef2-d7fa69f76d18@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] check with serial  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 05/03/2017 10:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> On 05/02/2017 10:13 PM, Vaishnavi Prabakaran wrote:
>>> And, now after your patch, do we still need "installcheck-parallel"
>>> command? It is redundant IMO, just give a thought.
>> I'd be quite happy to remove the target in favor of this more general
>> solution.
> -1 --- that will break a lot of existing habits to no purpose, not to
> mention creating complications for scripts used to test multiple branches.
> We have intentionally maintained backwards compatibility in these testing
> targets for a very long time, even though that's left us with
> inconsistencies like installcheck defaulting to serial while check
> defaults to parallel.  Adding a new capability is not an excuse for
> breaking the historical test targets.
>
>             



OK

cheers

andrew

-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Claudio Freire
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining