> > Still, it's an interesting alternative. Comments anyone?
>
> SelfExclusiveLock is clear and can't be confused with other
> lock types.
How about giving it a label ? SelfExclusive would somehow suggest,
that you can have more than one self exclusive lock.
Like:lock table atab in self exclusive mode for "vacuum";does not conflict with:lock table atab in self exclusive mode
for"account balancing";
Andreas
