AW: AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inhe rited from template1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Subject AW: AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inhe rited from template1
Date
Msg-id 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA687963368101@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
> To me, though, the point of independent databases is that they be
> *independent*, and therefore if we keep them I'd vote for mapping them
> to the top-level SQL notion (catalog, you said?).  Schemas ought to be
> substructure within a database.

Yes, that was also "sort of" the bottom line of the lengthy thread, so
I guess we could call it a plan.

Andreas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
Next
From: Philip Warner
Date:
Subject: Re: AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1