> ...and xinx for the respective index files.
>
> Since pg_ is already a "system" reserved prefix, how about pg_v[oid]
> and pg_x[oid]? Would kill two birds with one stone...would identify
> them as system tables/indexes while not clashing with user tables.
>
> This would simply the psql queries for the \d commands...would pg_dump
> be able to filter out pg_[xv][0-9]+ tables/indexes?
I think we have this inv* thing worked around for 6.1. The code now
expects large objects to look like xinv[0-9], which drastically limits
the namespace, and should prevent user-table name collision.
The real answer is to give large objects their own reltype, as Vadim
suggested.
- --
Bruce Momjian
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us
------------------------------
