Re: Experiences with extensibility - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Martin
Subject Re: Experiences with extensibility
Date
Msg-id 1199911896.86773@no.spam
Whole thread Raw
In response to Experiences with extensibility  (Eric Davies <eric@barrodale.com>)
Responses Re: Experiences with extensibility  (Guido Neitzer <lists@event-s.net>)
Re: Experiences with extensibility  (Guido Neitzer <guido@event-s.net>)
List pgsql-general
In article <92404875-3F83-43A2-B9B1-88C662A077FD@event-s.net>,
Guido Neitzer <lists@event-s.net> wrote:

>FrontBase. It has an incredibly easy to configure replication and
>multi master clustering support, is very reliable and can also handle
>really big databases.

I've been working with FrontBase a lot lately and I wouldn't say
anything about it qualifies as "incredibly easy" and reliable it
is not. Performance of FrontBase is just plain terrible. One of
our reports takes 9 minutes on FrontBase and 10 seconds on
Postgres.

Then there's the documentation issue...


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Nikolay Samokhvalov"
Date:
Subject: Re: XML path function
Next
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: quick question abt pg_dump and restore