[OT] Slony (initial) Replication - Slow - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ow Mun Heng
Subject [OT] Slony (initial) Replication - Slow
Date
Msg-id 1199330123.4569.30.camel@neuromancer.home.net
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [OT] Slony (initial) Replication - Slow
List pgsql-general
I'm just wetting my hands with slony and during the setup of the slave,
I did and dump and restore of the master DB to the Slave DB.

However during the startup of slony, I noticed that it issues a truncate
command to the (to be) replicated table. Hence, this means that there's
no such need for me to do a dump/restore in the 1st place.

can someone confirm this? It _is_ taking long time (for slony) to do the
\copy (~60GB in multiple tables being replicated, including (on the fly)
index creation)

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Goboxe
Date:
Subject: Using syslog on pg for Windows
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: How to handle 'not a number' in postgresql