On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 12:49 -0500, Josh Harrison wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 27, 2007 12:37 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 10:49:10AM -0500, Josh Harrison wrote:
> > Hi,
> > We are trying to use slony and WAL shipping for warm standby
> for replication
>
>
> It's unusual to use both. Any reason you want to?
>
> We wanted to have 1 master and 1 slave that can be queried and 1 warm
> standby server that can be brought up in case of crash. So I thought
> it might be better to have WAL shipping for warm standby since thats
> working pretty good and Slony for master-slave replication.
> Let me know your comments on this setup? What is better for this
> setup?
That's a setup I've recommended in the past.
It's like using RAC and Data Guard together, which is also common.
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
