Re: Proposal - Enabling btree_gist by default - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Proposal - Enabling btree_gist by default
Date
Msg-id 1197543.1767575903@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Proposal - Enabling btree_gist by default  (Alastair Turner <minion@decodable.me>)
Responses Re: Proposal - Enabling btree_gist by default
List pgsql-hackers
Alastair Turner <minion@decodable.me> writes:
> Before wading into all of that - what is the view on enabling btree_gist by
> default in initdb?

Absolutely, positively not until we've dealt with the inet mess:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/2483812.1754072263%40sss.pgh.pa.us

Even once that dust settles, I'm not sure that "install the extension
by default" is an acceptable approach.  In the past we've usually
preferred to migrate functionality into core.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Karlsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Use Postgres as meson wrap subproject
Next
From: Richard Guo
Date:
Subject: Re: Correction of RowMark Removal During Sel-Join Elimination